Asher, M., Bandeira, C. L., & Spaiser, V. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness of the e-petition procedure through Twitter conversations. doc174.pdf (oidp.net) <https://lida.leeds.ac.uk/research-projects/assessing-the-effectiveness-of-the-e-petition-procedure-through-twitter-conversations/>

 

Baker, J. (1993). Statutory Interpretation and Parliamentary Intention. The Cambridge Law Journal, 52(3), 353-357. 

 

Bauer, T. K. & Bender, S. (2004). Technological Change, Organizational Change, and Job Turnover. Labour Economics, 11 (3), 265-291

 

Bentivegna, S. (1998). Talking Politics on the Net. Research Paper R-20. The Joan Shorenstein Center, Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government.

​

Boehme-Neßler, V. (2019). Digitising Democracy: On Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era - A Legal, Political and Psychological Perspective. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

 

Borup et al. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18:3-4, 285-298, DOI: 10.1080/09537320600777002

 

Bernard, A. B. & Jones, C. I. (1996). Technology and Convergence. The Economic Journal, Volume 106, 1037-1044.

 

Boudreau M.C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective. Organization Science, 16 (1), 3-18.

 

Bowman, N. D., Westerman, D. K. & Claus, C. J. (2012). How demanding is social media: Understanding social media diets as a function of perceived costs and benefits – A rational actor perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2298-2305.

 

Clemens, E. S. and Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology 25:441-466.

​

Coleman, S. (1999). The New Media and Democratic Politics. New Media & Society. 1(1):67-74. doi:10.1177/1461444899001001011

​

Coleman, S & Gøtze, J. Bowling Together. (2001). Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. Hansard Society. 

 

Coleman, S.  (2004) Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 7:1, 1-22, DOI: 10.1080/1369118042000208870

 

Cordella, A. & Iannacci, F. (2010). Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 19 (2010) 52–66

 

De Faria, C. F. S. (2013). The open parliament in the Age of the Internet: Can the People Now Collaborate with

Legislatures in Lawmaking? Brasilia, Documentation and Information Center: Edições Câmara.

 

Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

 

Fountain, J. E. (2006). Enacting Technology in Networked Governance: Developmental Processes of Cross-Agency Arrangements. National Center for Digital Government Working Paper Series. 16, 1-45. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/ncdg/16

 

Gamm, G., & Shepsle, K. (1989). Emergence of Legislative Institutions: Standing Committees in the House and Senate, 1810-1825. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 14(1), 39-66. Retrieved October 24, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/440091

 

Garson, G.D. (2003). Technological Teleology and the Theory of Technology Enactment: The Case of the International Trade Data System. Social Science Computer Review, 21 (4), 425-431.

 

Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutions and their Design. In Robert E. Goodin, (editor), The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-53

 

Grafton, C. (2003). "Shadow Theories" in Fountain's Theory of Technology Enactment. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 411-416.

 

Griffith, J. & Leston-Bandeira. (2012). How are Parliaments Using New Media to Engage with Citizens. The Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol.18, Nos.3–4. pp.495–512

 

Jones, M. (2004) Policy legitimation, expert advice, and objectivity: ‘opening’ the UK governance framework for human genetics, Social Epistemology, 18:2-3, 247-270, DOI: 10.1080/0269172042000249318

 

Kapur, D. & Mehta, P. B. (2006). The Indian Parliament as an Institution of Accountability. Democracy, Governance and Human Rights Programme Paper Number 23. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

 

Kotanidis, S. (2020). Parliament's Right of Legislative Initiative. European Parliamentary Research Service.

 

Leonardi, P. M. & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory About Technology and Organizing. Information and Organization, Volume 8, 159-176.

 

Leston-Bandeira, C. (2004). From Legislation to Legitimation: The Role of the Portuguese Parliament. London and New York: Routledge.

 

Leston-Bandeira, C. & Norton, P. (2005). Parliamentary Institutions: Basic Concepts.

Project VIE/02/007 Strengthening the Capacity of People’s Elected Bodies in Viet Nam. Office of the National Assembly, United Nations Development Programme.

 

Leston-Bandeira, C. (2007). The Impact of the Internet on Parliaments: a Legislative Studies Framework. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4), 655-674.

 

Luce, R. (2006). Legislative Principles: The History and Theory of Lawmaking by Representative Government. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

 

Luna-Reyes, L. F. & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Understanding the Co-Evolution of Institutions, Technology, and Organizations: The Enactment of the State Government Portal of Puebla. The Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 214-223. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/2479724

​

​

Malina, A. (1999). Perspectives on Citizen Democratization and Alienation in the Virtual Public Sphere. In Hague, B. N. & Loader, B. D. (editors), Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. London: Routledge, pp. 23-38.

​

March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press.

​

Martin, L. W. & Vanberg, G. (2011). Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Government.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Miller, L. (2009). E-Petitions at Westminster: the Way Forward for Democracy? Parliamentary Affairs. Volume 62, Issue 1, pp. 162-177.

 

North, D. (1991). Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97-112.

 

Norton, P. (1990). Parliaments: A Framework for Analysis. West European Politics, 13(3), 1-9.

DOI: 10.1080/01402389008424803

 

Palthe, J. (2014). Regulative, Normative, and Cognitive Elements of Organizations: Implications for Managing Change. Management and Organizational Studies, 5(2), 59-66.

 

Panagiotopoulos, P., Sams, S., Elliman, T. & Fitzgerald, G. (2011). Do social networking groups support online petitions? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 20-31.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111114626

 

Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

 

Schech, S. (2002). Wired for Change: The Links Between ICTs and Development Discourses. Journal of International Development, 14, pages 13-23.

 

Schellong, A. (2006). Extending the Technology Enactment Framework. Program on Networked Governance. Harvard University. 1-9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252587378_Extending_the_Technology_Enactment_Framework>

 

Schwartz, E., Spiller, P., & Urbiztondo, S. (1994). A Positive Theory of Legislative Intent. Law and Contemporary Problems, 57(1), 51-74. doi:10.2307/1191985

 

Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences, Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 879-894. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.4.879

 

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

 

Shahryarifar, S. (2016). A Defence on the Prominence of Rational Actor Model within Foreign Policy Analysis. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(1), 22-29.

 

Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming Theory-practice Inconsistencies: Critical realism and Information Systems Research. Information and Organization 16, pages 191-211.

 

Waldron, J. (2009). Representative Lawmaking. Boston University Law Review. Volume 89, pages 335-355.

 

West, D. (2004). E-Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.  http://www.jstor.org/stable/3542623